Prediction of Jonas Trinker [861st] vs Mohamed Safwat [514th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W L W W L
Form
L L W L L W W W W LHead-2-Head: Trinker 1 - 0 Safwat
They have played 2 sets in total, with Trinker winning 2 and Safwat winning 0. The last match between Trinker and Safwat was at the M15 Vienna, 29-08-2024, Second, Clay with Jonas Trinker getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jonas Trinker | 1 |
| Mohamed Safwat | 0 |
| Trinker | Stats | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (5-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 861 | Ranking | 514 |
| 755 | Highest Rank | 130 |
| 29 | Age | 34 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 31 |
| 52% (216-199) | Career Total W/L | 59% (625-430) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $262,205 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Jonas Trinker
Player
Mohamed Safwat
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:32:0 | Average Match Time | 1:32:0 |
| 70% (30/43) | 1st Serve % | 78% (57/73) |
| 93% (28/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (33/57) |
| 31% (4/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 27% (4/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (35/73) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jonas Trinker vs Mohamed Safwat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trinker 1 - 0 Safwat
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trinker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Safwat has won 41.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trinker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Safwat has won 46.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 22.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trinker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Safwat has saved 53.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trinker has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 13), with Safwat winning 59.62% (W/L 31/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trinker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 130/ 129). Safwat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 301/ 162), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Trinker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Safwat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.71% of matches (W/L 23/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trinker winning 1 times and Safwat being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trinker winning 2 and Safwat winning 0. The last match between Trinker and Safwat was at the M15 Vienna, 29-08-2024, Second, Clay with Jonas Trinker getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trinker and Safwat have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trinker winning 0 times and Safwat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trinker winning 0, and Safwat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trinker has played against opponents with an average rank of 93.74 while Safwat has played against players with an average rank of 136.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trinker has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Safwat has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trinker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Safwat has converted 29.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jonas Trinker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Jonas Trinker
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
79%
(
65 of
82)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Mohamed Safwat
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Michael Zhu
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve %
91%
(
43 of
47)
8
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olle Wallin
Player
Jonas Trinker
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Alexander Wagner
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
13
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Jonas Trinker
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filippo Mazzola
Player
Jonas Trinker
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Erwin Troebinger
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano D'Agostino
Player
Jonas Trinker
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
Player
Jonas Trinker
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 1-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mohamed Safwat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Mohamed Safwat
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 6-7(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Oscar Moraing
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Leonardo Cattaneo
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Niklas Waldner
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Faris Zakaryia
Player
Mohamed Safwat
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carles Cordoba
Player
Mohamed Safwat
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
46%
(
47 of
103)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Mohamed Safwat
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Trinker vs Safwat?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Trinker Vs Safwat is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (216/199) | Win/Loss | 59% (625/430) |
| 52% (492/451) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1378/1033) |
| 51% (4553/4407) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (11939/10766) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 836 | Aces Total | 2511 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 647 | Total Double Faults | 1600 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 125.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 164.79 |
| 61% (8155/13420) | 1st Serve % | 59% (25470/42883) |
| 67% (5431/8155) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17995/25470) |
| 44% (2317/5264) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8819/17405) |
| 44% (556/1272) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1636/4013) |
| 40% (5215/13045) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16596/43546) |
| 52% (215/414) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (612/1028) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 58% (59/101) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (156/314) |
| 46% (53/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (161/290) |
| 84% (228/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (609/538) |
| 16% (228/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (609/71) |
| 13% (187/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (446/87) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
